Isn't there such a thing already, e.g. in the U.K., we have some standardization of salaries for different education levels, specialties and roles. I'll have to look up for the legal documents, but quick search returns payscale.com.
So, while this may be known, do you have more specifics, of what should be the pay distributions? And, btw., how would we deal with the reality, that different circumstances make people value things differently. For example, a surgery may have a huge (life-or-death) value to people, and yet, the social benefits systems working like insurance achieve the reasonable or zero prices on those events.
And, it's a bit like a sub-goal, rather than a method?
還不存在這樣的事情，例如在英國，我們對不同教育水平，專業和職位的薪水進行了標準化。我將不得不查找法律文件，但快速搜索會返回[payscale.com]（https://www.payscale.com/research/UK/Country=United_Kingdom/Salary）。
因此，雖然這可能是已知的，但您是否還有更多細節，工資分配應該是什麼？順便說一句，我們將如何面對現實，即不同的環境使人們對事物的評價不同。例如，手術對人們來說可能具有巨大的（生死攸關）價值，但是，像保險一樣運作的社會福利制度卻在這些事件上實現了合理的價格或零價格。
而且，它有點像一個子目標，而不是一種方法？
Isn't there such a thing already, e.g. in the U.K., we have some standardization of salaries for different education levels, specialties and roles. I'll have to look up for the legal documents, but quick search returns payscale.com.
So, while this may be known, do you have more specifics, of what should be the pay distributions? And, btw., how would we deal with the reality, that different circumstances make people value things differently. For example, a surgery may have a huge (life-or-death) value to people, and yet, the social benefits systems working like insurance achieve the reasonable or zero prices on those events.
And, it's a bit like a sub-goal, rather than a method?
//還不存在這樣的事情 信息透明的話，應該是可能的。 我覺得很多不合理的價格是因爲供、需的信息不透明而產生的。如果在同一個市場上（同樣規則的市場），大家能得到同樣的信息，就可以協商出合理的價格。